Current Research

Reference: ``Weighted Design Optimality Criteria'' (under review)

Tables of Response Surface Designs

  • For k=3, k=4, and k=5 Factors

    Tables of Reduced Response Surface Models

  • 43 Models for 3 Factors
  • 224 Models for 4 Factors
  • 839 Models for 5 Factors

    Tables of D, G, A, and IV-criteria Values for 3-Factor Response Surface Designs

  • Box-Draper design
  • CCD (Central Composite Design)
  • SCD (Hartley's Small Composite Design)
  • Notz design
  • Hoke design D2
  • Hoke design D6

    Tables of D, G, A, and IV-criteria Values for 4-Factor Response Surface Designs

  • Box-Draper design
  • CCD (Central Composite Design)
  • SCD (Hartley's Small Composite Design)
  • PBCD (Draper's Small Composite Design)
  • Notz design
  • Hoke design D2
  • Hoke design D5

    Tables of D, G, A, and IV-criteria Values for 5-Factor Response Surface Designs

  • Box-Draper design
  • CCD (Central Composite Design)
  • PBCD (Draper's Small Composite Design)
  • Hoke design D2
  • Hoke design D7

    Reference: ``Comparison of Design Optimality Criteria of Reduced Models for Response Surface Designs in the Hypercube'' (Technometrics 2001)

    Design Comparisons of D, G, IV and A Optimality Criteria

  • Table of Comparisons